Wait a minute…
Just so I have this right,
A billionaire who hasn’t voted in 26 years suddenly decides she’s the most qualified to run California.
Immeasurable arrogance aside, let’s pretend for a moment there’s a moral preponderance for civic duty (which to date hasn’t been proven in any way).
Regardless of party affiliation, she’s spending too much of her own money.
Is that a precedent that needs to be set?
Does the state need to be run by the person with the most money?
Imagine the possibilities.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7OpNsiUIeA[/youtube]
Wow, another politician politically dodging questions and futilely attempting to divert the conversation.
How refreshing.